Unidentified Aerial Phenomena – scientific analysis: The CSIRO and people 22,500 gadgets – #ufo #unusual
My CSIRO FOIA request
On 29 August 2022, I submitted an FOIA request to the CSIRO, as follows:
“I search all emails, despatched to/from or cc’d, CSIRO employees, together with any attachments, for the interval 1 June 2021 to 29 August 2022; which include key phrases “Unidentified Aerial Phenomena;” and/or “UAP” and/or “UAPs” and/or “Unidentified Flying Object” and/or “UFO.”
A response letter, dated 20 September 2022, FOI 2022/46, included the next reply:
“CSIRO’s FOI staff has carried out inside enquiries to establish what number of doubtlessly related paperwork CSIRO would possibly maintain that relate to your request and the work required to seek for, establish and collate these paperwork, previous to reviewing them and getting ready a choice in response to your request.
Given the quantity of labor we estimate that might be required, I’ve determined that I have to ship you this discover of an intention to refuse entry to the paperwork you could have requested…
The outcomes of our searches todate point out that CSIRO is prone to maintain not less than roughly 22,500 gadgets together with emails and attachments, which may be related to your request…
This quantity of things regarding a subject about which the CSIRO says it doesn’t analysis or examine, appeared extreme, and I puzzled how this quantity of things might be potential?
Grant Lavac
In October 2022, Melbourne researcher Grant Lavac submitted his personal FOIA request, finally scoped as:
“…a replica of all emails and supporting file attachments (excluding media clippings); despatched to/from or cc’d CSIRO employees for the interval 1 July 2022 to five October 2022 (inclusive) that include any of the next key phrases: Unidentifed Aerial Phenomena, Unidentified Aerospace Phenomena, Unexplained Aerial Phenomena, Unexplained Aerospace Phenomena, Unidentified Flying Object, UFO, Unidentified Flying Objects, UFOs, Unauthorised Plane Motion, Unauthorised Plane Actions, Uncommon Aerial Sighting.
The CSIRO, in a letter dated 18 November 2022, partially responded:
“I verify that digital searches have been carried out by CSIRO Data Managment and Expertise employees of all CSIRO e-mail accounts…The searches resulted in a really excessive quantity of paperwork being captured, together with emails containing quite a few media feeds that have been addressed to a number of workers…From the roughly 7,000 gadgets captured…CSIRO’s FOI staff recognized 4 paperwork that fall inside the scope of your request as a result of inclusion of one of many key phrases…”
4 paperwork
1. An e-mail dated 1 July 2022 from [redacted] to [redacted A&F, Black Mountain] Topic: Whata headline. “I’m wondering what they have been going on the market? Sounds suss. And the place is the wheel? UFO nation on the market.”
There was a hyperlink proven of https://duchetridao.com/two-men-mired-and-lost-on-south-african-outback-dirt-road-for-two-days-rescued-by-police
2. An e-mail dated 28 September 2022 from [redacted L&W, Sandy Bay] to Inexperienced Acres Hydroponics, “…sadly considered one of our 200w UFOs we purchased off you has spontaneously stopped working…”
3. An e-mail dated 5 October 2022 from [redacted A & O Hobart to [redacted] topic Re: Freezer UFO13.” “…freezer in fixed alarm.” Except this can be a repeat of the 2013 story of an “alien saved in a freezer,” then it’s of no worth to us.
4. An e-mail dated 5 October 2022 from [redcated to [redacted] topic freezer in alarm. “The upright -80 freezer UFO13…”
So, of the 7,000 gadgets captured between 1 July and 5 October 2022, we find yourself with 4 paperwork. Examine this to the roughly 22,500 gadgets captured for my request between 1 June 2021 and 29 August 2022, and we have no idea what number of precise related paperwork would have resulted if they’d gone via the 22,500 gadgets. Nevertheless, given the character of the 4 paperwork offered to Grant Lavac; it’s cheap to infer that the roughly, 22,500 gadgets would have produced could also be a dozen paperwork. If these dozen have been of the identical high quality because the 4 launched to Grant, then they might have been of no worth to us.
