The Atlantean Conspiracy: The Immaterial Bodily World

“Up till the current, biology and physics have been handmaidens of
views espoused by Isaac Newton, the daddy of recent physics … These, at their
essence, created a world view of separateness. 
Newton
described a cloth world wherein particular person particles of matter adopted
sure legal guidelines of movement via area and time – the universe as a machine … The
Newtonian world might need been law-abiding, however finally it was a lonely,
desolate place.  The world carried on,
one huge gearbox, whether or not we had been current or not … Our self-image grew even
bleaker with the work of Charles Darwin. 
His principle of evolution is of a life that’s random, predatory,
purposeless and solitary.  Be the very best or
don’t survive.  You might be not more than an
evolutionary accident … These paradigms – the world as a machine, man as
survival machine – have led to a technological mastery of the universe, however
little actual data of any central significance to us.  On a religious and metaphysical degree, they
have led to probably the most determined and brutal sense of isolation.  In addition they have gotten us no nearer to understanding
probably the most basic mysteries of our personal being:  how we predict, how life begins, why we get
in poor health, how a single cell turns into a totally fashioned individual, and even what occurs
to human consciousness once we die.” 
-Lynne McTaggart, “The Discipline: The Quest for the Secret Pressure of the
Universe,” (XXIV-XXV)

Newton’s
mechanistic, mathematical mannequin is engaging with its law-abiding, predictable
construction, but it surely repeatedly falls quick in describing a big selection of
phenomena which “classical physics” is thus compelled to disclaim or ignore.  These embody issues corresponding to consciousness,
the observer impact, the measurement downside, Heisenberg’s uncertainty
precept, nonlocality and quantum entanglement, particle/wave duality,
bilocation, telepathy, psychokinesis, clairvoyance, precognition,
out-of-body experiences, near-death experiences, ghosts, shamanic/religious
therapeutic, acupuncture, prayer, the placebo impact, psychoneuroimmunology and
many extra anomalies, all of that are at odds with classical physics and can
be examined within the coming chapters.

“The
world view which was modified by the discoveries of recent physics had been
primarily based on Newton’s
mechanical mannequin of the universe. This mannequin constituted the strong framework of
classical physics. It was certainly a most formidable basis supporting, like
a mighty rock, all of science and offering a agency foundation for pure philosophy
for nearly three centuries.  The stage of
the Newtonian universe, on which all bodily phenomena came about, was the
three-dimensional area of classical Euclidean geometry. It was an absolute
area, all the time at relaxation and unchangeable. In Newton’s personal phrases, ‘Absolute area, in its
personal nature, with out regard to something exterior, stays all the time related and
immovable.’ All adjustments within the bodily world had been described by way of a
separate dimension, known as time, which once more was absolute, having no connection
with the fabric world and flowing easily from the previous via the current
to the longer term. ‘Absolute, true, and mathematical time,’ mentioned Newton, ‘of itself and by its personal nature,
flows uniformly, with out regard to something exterior.”  -Fritjof Capra, “The Tao of Physics” (55)

The primary
steps away from Newtonian physics got here with Einstein’s principle of relativity exhibiting Newton
to be incorrect in his view of absolute area and absolute time.  As a substitute, each area and time have confirmed to
be relativistic, interrelated ideas which at the moment are extra appropriately
known as “space-time.”  As written
by physicist Mendel Sachs, “The true revolution that got here with Einstein’s
principle . . . was the abandonment of the concept that the space-time coordinate
system has goal significance as a separate bodily entity. As a substitute of
this concept, relativity principle implies that the area and time coordinates are
solely the weather of a language that’s utilized by an observer to explain his
surroundings.”  Einstein confirmed that
area and time will not be absolute buildings with impartial a priori existence
as classical physics espouses.  In reality,
area and time are relativistic and subjective, a notion which metaphysically
locations them subordinate to the thoughts/consciousness perceiving them!  The magical implications of this discovery
are huge and might be coated intimately later, however first let’s look at
whether or not or not we even stay in a “materials” universe in any respect.  What has fashionable physics found about
atoms, the so-called constructing blocks of matter?  

“For 2
thousand years it was believed that atoms had been tiny strong balls – a mannequin
clearly drawn from on a regular basis expertise. Then, as physicists found that atoms
had been composed of extra elementary, sub-atomic particles (electrons, protons,
neutrons and suchlike) the mannequin shifted to one in every of a central nucleus surrounded
by orbiting electrons – once more a mannequin primarily based on expertise.  An atom could also be small, a mere billionth of an
inch throughout, however these sub-atomic particles are 100 thousand instances
smaller nonetheless. Think about the nucleus of an atom magnified to the dimensions of a grain
of rice. The entire atom would then be the dimensions of a soccer stadium, and the
electrons could be different grains of rice flying around the stands. Because the early
twentieth-century British physicist Sir Arthur Eddington put it, ‘matter is
principally ghostly empty area’ – 99.9999999% empty area, to be just a little extra
exact.”  -Peter Russell, “From Science to God”

“For a begin, what we understand to be ‘bodily’ and ‘strong’ is
something however. Science says that what we see as ‘kind’ – individuals, buildings,
panorama and many others. – are product of atoms. Okay, however the bother with the ‘strong
world’ principle is that atoms will not be strong. Greater than that, they’re principally
empty. How can one thing that isn’t strong create a strong surroundings? It
cannot. Atoms include electrons orbiting a nucleus (protons and neutrons),
however it’s the proportions that inform the story. Atoms are greater than 99%  empty area to our human actuality, but they’re
described as the basic building-blocks of matter – sure, ‘strong’ matter.”
–David Icke, “The David Icke Information to the World Conspiracy” (34)

“Study
every a part of the cabin. The partitions are product of wooden. What makes wooden what it’s?
A configuration of wooden cells exists as a log, and every of those cells can’t
exist and not using a configuration of molecules. Likewise, every molecule consists
of atoms. Every atom incorporates electrons, protons, and neutrons. Every atomic
particle consists of quarks, and many others., and many others., and many others. All the things might be damaged down
into components. Even when one way or the other a ‘factor’ was discovered that would not be damaged down,
it will nonetheless have components as a result of if it didn’t, it couldn’t be used to make
extra complicated issues. Something that has spatial extent requires that it has a
entrance, a again, a form – totally different components. 
On the degree of atoms, the gap from one atom to a different in
relationship to the diameter of the nucleus of the atom is ‘astronomical.’
There may be extra vacancy within the atoms composing the wall of a cabin than there
is matter! And this goes for all matter. 
All matter is usually vacancy … What prevents your hand, for instance,
from passing via a wall will not be that there’s some ‘factor’ or ‘issues’
(atoms) in the way in which, however extra so as a result of there’s an atomic power subject that
prevents the atoms from one’s hand to go by the atoms of the wall.”
–Aaron G. L. Adoni, “The Gnosis of Kali Yuga” (137)

“How
can one thing that isn’t strong be the constructing blocks that assemble this
‘strong’ wall I’m now? It may possibly’t – our brains do it.  With the emergence of quantum physics,
science has needed to concede that atoms will not be strong … The atoms that comprise
‘bodily’ matter are overwhelmingly ’empty’ and even illustrations of this are
deceptive as a result of there’s not sufficient room in a guide or science paper to
precisely depict the proportions of particles to ’empty area’. As one author
put it: ‘If an atom was the dimensions of a cathedral, the nucleus could be in regards to the
dimension of a ten cent piece.’  The remainder is
‘empty’ to the notion of the 5 senses as a result of it consists of power
vibrating on wavelengths greater than the ‘bodily’, and even the particles are
discovered to be empty as you go deeper into the subatomic realm. If you happen to amplify
something powerfully sufficient and go deeper than the atom, you can see that
nothing has solidity – No, not even buildings, automobiles, mountains or the bones in
your physique. It is Phantasm! If you happen to discover this tough to just accept, consider your
desires. You dream in three-dimensional photos and but nobody claims they’re
strong do they?” –David Icke, “Infinite Love is the Solely Fact, All the things
Else is Phantasm” (40)

Nobel
Prize profitable physicist Niels Bohr was the inventor of the Bohr Atom Mannequin seen
in each high-school physics/chemistry textbook depicting the atom as a mini
photo voltaic system with a central nucleus orbited by bands of electrons.  He created this mannequin of the atom with which
we’re all so acquainted, but he himself knew the mannequin was incorrect at a
basic degree.  He wrote that, “Remoted
materials particles are abstractions, their properties being definable and
observable solely via their interplay with different techniques.”  In different phrases, no atom or sub-atomic
particle has an remoted, separate existence. 
No materials particle has impartial properties or location as distinct
from some other.  On the atomic and
subatomic ranges, no “factor” is separate from each “factor” else – there’s
simply One subject of pulsating power that composes the complete bodily universe.  It has been known as The Ether, The Discipline, The
Quantum Discipline, The Zero-Level Discipline, and lots of different names, all referring to
this important, energetic Oneness.  So,
not solely was Newton’s
classical physics incorrect about absolute area and time, it was incorrect
in regards to the universe being composed of separate particles of matter. 

Everybody
is aware of Einstein’s well-known system E=MC² which means Power = Mass x Mild
Pace squared.  What we’re seldom taught,
nonetheless, are the implications of this equation. 
E=MC² reveals that matter and power are actually simply two
totally different types of the identical factor.  Einstein’s
system and quantum physics have each verified that every one matter is basically simply
power vibrating at a low frequency. 
Which means that power, the One undifferentiated subject of quantum
zero-point power, is the first actuality; So-called “empty” area, “strong” matter,
and “separate” types, are simply subjective interpretations of the One underlying
power.  As Albert Einstein himself mentioned,
“We could due to this fact regard matter as being constituted by the areas of area
wherein the sector is extraordinarily intense … There is no such thing as a place on this new type of
physics each for the sector and matter, for the sector is the one actuality.”

Experiments
in quantum physics have proven that atoms and all subatomic particles are extra
like verbs than nouns.  They’re extra
like power bundles or patterns of quantum potential than they’re like strong
billiard balls or mini photo voltaic techniques. 
The underlying major actuality is the power subject, and “power” itself is
extra a verb, an motion, a possible, than a noun – it’s not some set “factor.”  After we peer deeply into the subatomic ranges
of matter, we see solely this power, this consistently flowing, interacting
subject.  To make sense of it we create
nouns/fashions like atoms, electrons, quarks, however probably the most acceptable “mannequin”
could be a verb, like “common energizing.” 

“These
dynamic patterns, or ‘power bundles’, kind the steady nuclear, atomic and
molecular buildings which construct up matter and provides it its macroscopic strong
facet, thus making us consider that it’s product of some materials substance. At
the macroscopic degree, this notion of substance is a helpful approximation, however
on the atomic degree it now not is sensible. Atoms include particles and
these particles will not be product of any materials stuff. After we observe them, we
by no means see any substance; what we observe are dynamic patterns regularly
turning into each other – a steady dance of power.”  -Fritjof Capra, “The Tao of Physics” (203)